Re: [PATCH 3/4] pm34xx: Warning FIX related to ambiguous else loop

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Abhilash K V <abhilash.kv@xxxxxx> writes:

> From: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx>
>
> Fixes below warning -
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c:1041: warning:
>         suggest explicit braces to avoid ambiguous 'else

This warning was introduced in [1/4], so I'd suggest just folding this
fix into the original patch.

Kevin

> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaibhav@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Abhilash K V <abhilash.kv@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> index 12af5b9..ab3822b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> @@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ void omap_push_sram_idle(void)
>  	else
>  		_omap_sram_idle = omap_sram_push(omap34xx_cpu_suspend,
>  					omap34xx_cpu_suspend_sz);
> -	if (omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP)
> +	if (omap_type() != OMAP2_DEVICE_TYPE_GP) {
>  		if (cpu_is_omap3505() || cpu_is_omap3517())
>  			_omap_save_secure_sram = omap_sram_push(
>  					omap3517_save_secure_ram_context,
> @@ -865,6 +865,7 @@ void omap_push_sram_idle(void)
>  			_omap_save_secure_sram = omap_sram_push(
>  					save_secure_ram_context,
>  					save_secure_ram_context_sz);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  static void __init pm_errata_configure(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux