On Aug 19, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Koul, Vinod wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 15:06 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Koul, Vinod <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Currently we have two approaches to solve this problem first being the >>> DMA_STRIDE_CONFIG proposed by Linus W, I feel this one is better >>> approach as this can give client ability to configure each transfer >>> rather than set for the channel. Linus W, do you agree? >> >> I think Sundaram is in the position of doing some heavy work on >> using one or the other of the API:s, and I think he is better >> suited than anyone else of us to select what scheme to use, >> in the end he's going to write the first code using the API. > And Unfortunately TI folks don't seem to care about this discussion :( > Haven't seen anything on this from them, or on previous RFC by Jassi IIRC, Sundaram went on holiday. I suspect he cares a lot about this discussion as he has a session on the topic at LPC. -Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
