* Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [110810 05:31]:
>
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 05:55:20PM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> > +
> > +int __init omap_devinit_temp_sensor(void)
> > +{
> > + if (!cpu_is_omap446x())
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return omap_hwmod_for_each_by_class("temperature_sensor",
> > + temp_sensor_dev_init, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +arch_initcall(omap_devinit_temp_sensor);
>
> I really dislike people adding more and more *initcall() to their pieces
> of code. But Tony is the final Judge.
Yes how about making this just a regular device driver and have it
live under drivers/ somewhere?
Or is there some reason why this could not be a loadable module?
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
