Re: [linux-pm] Runtime PM discussion notes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday, July 30, 2011, Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> > > > IIRC I solved it by just calling _PTS when sleepy Linux was
> > > > enabled. It had side effect of lighting up moon icon, but otherwise
> > > > seemed to work ok.
> > > > 
> > > > I do not think ACPI says what can and can not be done after _PTS...
> > > 
> > > Yes, it does.
> > 
> > And even if _PTS will work, you're certainly not supposed to execute _WAK
> > with interrupts off.
> 
> It should be ok to execute _WAK in process context once system is
> resumed. ... or maybe not executing _WAK at all. User can probably
> live with moon icon lighted up.

But I don't think the user can live with certain functionality missing,
like battery status or such things.

This is completely unrealistic to think that your prototype can be safely
implemented on _every_ ACPI-based system.  Period.

And that's even without taking SMP into account, BTW.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux