During normal system operation warning messages similar to this
are appearing quite often:
omap_device: omap4-keypad.-1: new worst case activate latency 0: 61035
This doesn't seem to be reporting a problem, nor is it very useful for
non-developers, so reduce it to debug level.
Cc: Steve Sakoman <steve@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Applies on top of git://git.pwsan.com/linux-2.6 prcm-devel-3.1
+ Kevin's "OMAP: omap_device: replace pr_* prints with dev_*".
arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
index 1914d7e..f363cbf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/omap_device.c
@@ -146,10 +146,10 @@ static int _omap_device_activate(struct omap_device *od, u8 ignore_lat)
odpl->activate_lat_worst = act_lat;
if (odpl->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST) {
odpl->activate_lat = act_lat;
- dev_warn(&od->pdev.dev,
- "new worst case activate latency "
- "%d: %llu\n",
- od->pm_lat_level, act_lat);
+ dev_dbg(&od->pdev.dev,
+ "new worst case activate latency "
+ "%d: %llu\n",
+ od->pm_lat_level, act_lat);
} else
dev_warn(&od->pdev.dev,
"activate latency %d "
@@ -213,10 +213,10 @@ static int _omap_device_deactivate(struct omap_device *od, u8 ignore_lat)
odpl->deactivate_lat_worst = deact_lat;
if (odpl->flags & OMAP_DEVICE_LATENCY_AUTO_ADJUST) {
odpl->deactivate_lat = deact_lat;
- dev_warn(&od->pdev.dev,
- "new worst case deactivate latency "
- "%d: %llu\n",
- od->pm_lat_level, deact_lat);
+ dev_dbg(&od->pdev.dev,
+ "new worst case deactivate latency "
+ "%d: %llu\n",
+ od->pm_lat_level, deact_lat);
} else
dev_warn(&od->pdev.dev,
"deactivate latency %d "
--
1.7.0.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
