Am Freitag, den 15.07.2011, 00:50 -0700 schrieb Tony Lindgren: > Well we can add it even before device tree support if it makes > sense from code coalescing point of view. In this case it would > mean creating board-panda-common.c or similar so the code can > be shared amongst the panda variants. > > It seems that some GPIO pins are different and there are some > difference in devices connected, but big parts of the code can be > shared. > > Adding the pending boards without combining code would be adding code > that will be going away for most part with the device tree support. > > And most likely the beagle and panda based boards will be the first > ones to work with device tree. So anything we can do to have common > board init code will also help with this effort. > > Regards, > > Tony pcm049 and panda board have some more different devices. I am working on patches to add NAND support and using tlv320aic3x audio codec which need regulators in platformcode. I need a hack to controll usb otg by gpio (controlling a external power circuit). The patches are not mainline ready by now. If using machine_is_xxxx() in board-omap4panda.c then also is good way, I could provide our board as patches on top of board-omap4panda.c. When will pandaboard use device tree to boot? Kind Regards, Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
