* Felipe Balbi <balbi@xxxxxx> [110715 00:53]: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:50:24AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Jan Weitzel <J.Weitzel@xxxxxxxxx> [110714 01:34]: > > > Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2011, 00:34 -0700 schrieb Tony Lindgren: > > > > * Jan Weitzel <J.Weitzel@xxxxxxxxx> [110713 05:51]: > > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 13.07.2011, 16:13 +0400 schrieb Sergei Shtylyov: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Have you added that 'i' at the end intentionally? > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. It was a tribute to vim. > > > > > > > > :i) > > > > > > > > I'll fold the fixed patch into your original patch. Will also > > > > keep the new board files in testing-board because of the code > > > > coalescing and device tree conversion effort. > > > > > > So there is no way to get the board mainline yet? > > > > Well we can add it even before device tree support if it makes > > sense from code coalescing point of view. In this case it would > > mean creating board-panda-common.c or similar so the code can > > be shared amongst the panda variants. > > > > It seems that some GPIO pins are different and there are some > > difference in devices connected, but big parts of the code can be > > shared. > > isn't it easier than to just add a few if (machine_is_xxxx()) checks and > another MACHINE_START() to board-omap4panda.c rather than creating a new > file, shuffling code around and then adding a new board file ?? That works too if the init_machine does not get too complicated. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
