Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:00:37PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Actually, I'd prefer it stay in drivers/regulator. We're trying to move >> driver-type stuff out of arch/arm/* into the right place in drivers/*. >> In fact, I wonder if our VP/VC layers might better live under >> drivers/regulator also. > > Well, if they don't look hideous in the API then sure. I'd guess it's > probably a case of lifting the implementation APIs that Tero's driver is > calling up into the regulator driver he's writing. Basically, yes. But it also would mean dragging the rest of the VC/VP APIs along as well. I'll work in this direction and hopefully have some better RFC type code to show soonish. Thanks, Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
