On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:35:53PM +0300, Péter Ujfalusi wrote: > Just to avoid confusion (in my part): if I split this patch to one big + > several small incremental patches, which eventually lead to the current > situation is what you were asking for? The rest of the patch looked fine from a code point of view so probably just leave that as-is and improve the changelog - the delayed_work was the only real issue I saw from a code point of view and the bit I was suggesting to split out into a separate patch. > With the patches I can document the reasoning behind the non standard > workarounds. Probably if we see them spread out, we might be able to find > better ways for them... Yeah, and like I say if it were controlled by the machine driver it'd be better. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
