Re: [PATCH v3 12/20] GPIO: OMAP: Use wkup_status for all SoCs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx> writes:

> On OMAP4 we are not allowed to access wakeup_set/clear registers.

We are allowed, it is not recommended.  Probably makes sense to
reference the TRM here.  Basically, these are legacy registers and
starting with OMAP4, the legacy registers should not be used in
combination with the updated regsiters.

> So instead of having additional check and separate logics for
> manipulating the status register use wakup_status regisre consistently

type: regisre

> for all SoCs wherever applicable. Use the MOD_REG_BIT macro to read,
> modify and write the status register.

Good, thanks for including this change.

> Signed-off-by: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c         |    2 -
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c             |    4 ---
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h |    2 -
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c               |   35 +++++++++++---------------------
>  4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c
> index abde9e9..08dda3c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c
> @@ -91,8 +91,6 @@ static struct omap_gpio_reg_offs omap16xx_gpio_regs = {
>  	.set_irqenable	= OMAP1610_GPIO_SET_IRQENABLE1,
>  	.clr_irqenable	= OMAP1610_GPIO_CLEAR_IRQENABLE1,
>  	.wkup_status	= OMAP1610_GPIO_WAKEUPENABLE,
> -	.wkup_clear	= OMAP1610_GPIO_CLEAR_WAKEUPENA,
> -	.wkup_set	= OMAP1610_GPIO_SET_WAKEUPENA,
>  	.edgectrl1	= OMAP1610_GPIO_EDGE_CTRL1,
>  	.edgectrl2	= OMAP1610_GPIO_EDGE_CTRL2,
>  };
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
> index be5a906..c99eea4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpio.c
> @@ -114,8 +114,6 @@ static int omap2_gpio_dev_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused)
>  		pdata->regs->debounce_en = OMAP24XX_GPIO_DEBOUNCE_EN;
>  		pdata->regs->ctrl = OMAP24XX_GPIO_CTRL;
>  		pdata->regs->wkup_status = OMAP24XX_GPIO_WAKE_EN;
> -		pdata->regs->wkup_clear = OMAP24XX_GPIO_CLEARWKUENA;
> -		pdata->regs->wkup_set = OMAP24XX_GPIO_SETWKUENA;
>  		pdata->regs->leveldetect0 = OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0;
>  		pdata->regs->leveldetect1 = OMAP24XX_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1;
>  		pdata->regs->risingdetect = OMAP24XX_GPIO_RISINGDETECT;
> @@ -139,8 +137,6 @@ static int omap2_gpio_dev_init(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused)
>  		pdata->regs->debounce_en = OMAP4_GPIO_DEBOUNCENABLE;
>  		pdata->regs->ctrl = OMAP4_GPIO_CTRL;
>  		pdata->regs->wkup_status = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQWAKEN0;
> -		pdata->regs->wkup_clear = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQWAKEN0;
> -		pdata->regs->wkup_set = OMAP4_GPIO_IRQWAKEN0;
>  		pdata->regs->leveldetect0 = OMAP4_GPIO_LEVELDETECT0;
>  		pdata->regs->leveldetect1 = OMAP4_GPIO_LEVELDETECT1;
>  		pdata->regs->risingdetect = OMAP4_GPIO_RISINGDETECT;
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> index 6dcbe7d..4f584de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/gpio.h
> @@ -191,8 +191,6 @@ struct omap_gpio_reg_offs {
>  	u16 debounce_en;
>  	u16 ctrl;
>  	u16 wkup_status;
> -	u16 wkup_clear;
> -	u16 wkup_set;
>  	u16 leveldetect0;
>  	u16 leveldetect1;
>  	u16 risingdetect;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index 42f0411..769fae7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -261,10 +261,11 @@ static void _toggle_gpio_edge_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio) {}
>  
>  static int _set_gpio_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int trigger)
>  {
> +	void __iomem *base = bank->base;
>  	void __iomem *reg = bank->base;
>  	u32 l = 0;
>  
> -	if (bank->regs->leveldetect0 && bank->regs->wkup_status) {
> +	if (bank->regs->leveldetect0) {

Why is the check for wkup_status removed here?   That field still
exists, and removing it leads to a blind register access below.

>  		set_gpio_trigger(bank, gpio, trigger);
>  	} else if (bank->regs->irqctrl) {
>  		reg += bank->regs->irqctrl;
> @@ -295,13 +296,7 @@ static int _set_gpio_triggering(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int trigger)
>  		if (trigger & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING)
>  			l |= 1 << (gpio << 1);
>  
> -		if (trigger)
> -			/* Enable wake-up during idle for dynamic tick */
> -			__raw_writel(1 << gpio, bank->base
> -						+ bank->regs->wkup_set);
> -		else
> -			__raw_writel(1 << gpio, bank->base
> -						+ bank->regs->wkup_clear);
> +		MOD_REG_BIT(bank->regs->wkup_status, 1 << gpio, trigger != 0);

This isn't right, so I'm not sure how this is working. At this point:

     base = bank->base;
     reg = bank->base + bank->regs->edgectrl[12];

but if you look at MOD_REG_BIT(), it does register access using 'base +
reg', but here that will be 'bank->base + bank->base + reg offset',
which will be doing a read/modify/write to who-knows-where.

>  		__raw_writel(l, reg);

Oh, now I see why it works: because you have an additional write here,
which isn't right either because MOD_REG_BIT() already does the read
*and* write.

>  	}
> @@ -515,13 +510,14 @@ static int omap_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>  static void omap_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>  {
>  	struct gpio_bank *bank = container_of(chip, struct gpio_bank, chip);
> +	void __iomem *base = bank->base;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>  
> -	if (bank->regs->wkup_clear)
> +	if (bank->regs->wkup_status)
>  		/* Disable wake-up during idle for dynamic tick */
> -		__raw_writel(1 << offset, bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_clear);
> +		MOD_REG_BIT(bank->regs->wkup_status, 1 << offset, 0);
>  
>  	bank->mod_usage &= ~(1 << offset);
>  
> @@ -1091,22 +1087,19 @@ static int omap_gpio_suspend(void)
>  	struct gpio_bank *bank;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(bank, &omap_gpio_list, node) {
> +		void __iomem *base = bank->base;
>  		void __iomem *wake_status;
> -		void __iomem *wake_clear;
> -		void __iomem *wake_set;
>  		unsigned long flags;
>  
>  		if (!bank->regs->wkup_status)
>  			return 0;
>  
>  		wake_status = bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_status;
> -		wake_clear = bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_clear;
> -		wake_set = bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_set;
>  
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
>  		bank->saved_wakeup = __raw_readl(wake_status);
> -		__raw_writel(0xffffffff, wake_clear);
> -		__raw_writel(bank->suspend_wakeup, wake_set);
> +		MOD_REG_BIT(bank->regs->wkup_status, 0xffffffff, 0);
> +		MOD_REG_BIT(bank->regs->wkup_status, bank->suspend_wakeup, 1);

You don't need two rmw accesses to the wkup_status.  Just do a single write.

>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -1118,19 +1111,15 @@ static void omap_gpio_resume(void)
>  	struct gpio_bank *bank;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(bank, &omap_gpio_list, node) {
> -		void __iomem *wake_clear;
> -		void __iomem *wake_set;
> +		void __iomem *base = bank->base;
>  		unsigned long flags;
>  
>  		if (!bank->regs->wkup_status)
>  			return;
>  
> -		wake_clear = bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_clear;
> -		wake_set = bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_set;
> -
>  		spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
> -		__raw_writel(0xffffffff, wake_clear);
> -		__raw_writel(bank->saved_wakeup, wake_set);
> +		MOD_REG_BIT(bank->regs->wkup_status, 0xffffffff, 0);
> +		MOD_REG_BIT(bank->regs->wkup_status, bank->saved_wakeup, 1);

ditto

>  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
>  	}
>  }

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux