On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:32:18PM +0300, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 13:18 +0200, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 01:27:47PM +0300, Tero Kristo wrote:
> > > @@ -854,20 +802,35 @@ static int __init omap3_pm_init(void)
> > > /* XXX prcm_setup_regs needs to be before enabling hw
> > > * supervised mode for powerdomains */
> > > prcm_setup_regs();
> > > + ret = omap_prcm_irq_init();
> > > + if (ret) {
> > > + pr_err("omap_prcm_irq_init() failed with %d\n", ret);
> > > + goto err_prcm_irq_init;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + prcm_wkup_irq = omap_prcm_event_to_irq("wkup");
> > > + prcm_io_irq = omap_prcm_event_to_irq("io");
> > > +
> > > + ret = request_irq(prcm_wkup_irq, _prcm_int_handle_wakeup,
> > > + IRQF_NO_SUSPEND | IRQF_DISABLED, "prcm_wkup", NULL);
> >
> > IRQF_DISABLED shouldn't be used anymore ;-)
>
> Oh man, well that is easy to remove as it doesn't do anything. Should I
> send a new version of the set for this? :P Kevin's call I guess.
yeah, Kevin's call :-)
> I just tried the set without this flag and yes it still works. :)
Good :-)
--
balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
