Hi Tony, On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 11:17:21PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> [110627 07:25]: > > Hi Tony, > > > > On Monday 27 June 2011 12:18:35 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> [110627 02:39]: > > > > > > > Hi Tony, Samuel, > > > > > > > > Would you have time to take a look at this series? > > > > > > > > > Looks good to me. If it conflicts with what we have queued > > > in the devel-cleanup branch, I should probably queue it. > > > > There are conflicts in mach-omap2 (quite a lot), if I apply the series on top > > of the devel-cleanup branch. > > > > > If there are no conflicts, then Samuel can queue it. > > > > I suppose this should then go through l-o... > > OK. Assuming Samuel is fine with the patches, I am fine with them. I just had some minor comments about patch #10, but you can go ahead and add my: Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> to patches #5,6,7,8 and 10. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
