Re: [PATCHv4 9/9] OMAP3: PM: Disable / enable PRCM chain interrupts during wakeup from suspend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> writes:

> This prevents system hang while attempting to access suspended console.

Please add more detail.  Who is accessing console?   This sounds more
like it's masking a UART/console bug.

> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c |    6 ++++++
>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> index e626a3d..dae0a8a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c
> @@ -418,6 +418,10 @@ void omap_sram_idle(void)
>  	pwrdm_post_transition();
>  
>  	clkdm_allow_idle(mpu_pwrdm->pwrdm_clkdms[0]);
> +	if (suspend_state != PM_SUSPEND_ON) {
> +		disable_irq(prcm_io_irq);
> +		disable_irq(prcm_wkup_irq);
> +	}

>  }
>  
>  int omap3_can_sleep(void)
> @@ -524,6 +528,8 @@ static void omap3_pm_end(void)
>  	suspend_state = PM_SUSPEND_ON;
>  	omap_uart_enable_irqs(1);
>  	enable_hlt();
> +	enable_irq(prcm_io_irq);
> +	enable_irq(prcm_wkup_irq);
>  	return;
>  }

The re-enable is in ->end(), shouldn't the disable be in ->begin() ?

Kevin


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux