Re: [PATCHv2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix loops_per_jiffy calculation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 03:29:57PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
>> Can't this rewrite the loops_per_jiffy for the other CPU while it is
>> in a udelay?  If it has already calculated the number of loops
>> necessary, and the CPU frequency increases, it could end up returning
>> too early from udelay.
>
> udelay uses the global loops_per_jiffy.
>

The problem is still the same - loops_per_jiffy applies to both CPUs,
and the frequency of the other CPU cannot be changed if it is in a
udelay.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux