On Thursday 23 June 2011 18:27:10 Grosen, Mark wrote: > First, we are not abandoning DSPLINK. We have many users of this, even > though it is out-of-tree, and we will continue to support it. That said, we > do intend to make this new design the basis for DSPLINK-like > functionality. It's designed to be done "the right way" for Linux (and we > are looking for feedback to make it better). It is also designed to be more > scalable and extensible in userspace. With a solid kernel foundation, we can > provide lots of functionality in userspace, or users can implement their own > custom solutions. One of the key things to do is map our existing DSPLINK > APIs, like MessageQ, to the new rpmsg transport. Sounds all good. What about the PRUSS code? Does that fit into the new model as well? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
