> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tushar Behera > Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 4:16 PM > To: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > linux-fbdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; tony@xxxxxxxxxxx; > lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx; linaro-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > patches@xxxxxxxxxx; Nilofer, Samreen > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] config: omap2+: force fb and dss support > as built-in > > In certain board files, there are references to vram related functions > which are defined in drivers/video/omap2/vram.c. Because of > this direct > dependency, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 should be a built-in feature. > > As per the current architecture, CONFIG_FB_OMAP2 is dependent on > CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS. Hence CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS support should also > be selected > by default. > > Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Samreen <samreen@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `rx51_video_mem_init': > linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-video.c:97: > undefined reference to `omap_vram_set_sdram_vram' > arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_reserve': > linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c:66: undefined > reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sdram_memblock' > arch/arm/plat-omap/built-in.o: In function `omap_detect_sram': > linux-linaro-2.6.39/arch/arm/plat-omap/sram.c:179: undefined > reference to `omap_vram_reserve_sram' > make[1]: *** [.tmp_vmlinux1] Error 1 > make: *** [sub-make] Error 2 > > arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig > b/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig > index d5f00d7..c3ffff2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/omap2plus_defconfig > @@ -138,11 +138,11 @@ CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID=y > CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y > CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING=y > CONFIG_FB_OMAP_LCD_VGA=y > -CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS=m > +CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS=y > CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_RFBI=y > CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_SDI=y > CONFIG_OMAP2_DSS_DSI=y > -CONFIG_FB_OMAP2=m > +CONFIG_FB_OMAP2=y > CONFIG_PANEL_GENERIC_DPI=m > CONFIG_PANEL_SHARP_LS037V7DW01=m > CONFIG_PANEL_NEC_NL8048HL11_01B=m [sp] Instead of changing the omap2plus_defconfig, shouldn't the board specific file be fixed instead? ~sanjeev > -- > 1.7.4.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe > linux-omap" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
