On Wed 15 Jun 2011 at 15:00:08 Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 02:53:01PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> >
> > $ grep -r "struct .* platform_device .* = {" .|grep "__initdata"|grep -v '*'
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c:static struct platform_device ams_delta_kp_device __initdata = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c:static struct platform_device ams_delta_lcd_device __initdata = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c:static struct platform_device ams_delta_led_device __initdata = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/board-ams-delta.c:static struct platform_device ams_delta_camera_device __initdata = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap7xx_mpu_gpio = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap7xx_gpio1 = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap7xx_gpio2 = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap7xx_gpio3 = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap7xx_gpio4 = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap7xx_gpio5 = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio7xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap7xx_gpio6 = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap15xx_mpu_gpio = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio15xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap15xx_gpio = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap16xx_mpu_gpio = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap16xx_gpio1 = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap16xx_gpio2 = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap16xx_gpio3 = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap1/gpio16xx.c:static struct __initdata platform_device omap16xx_gpio4 = {
> > ./arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:static struct platform_device rx51_si4713_dev __initdata_or_module = {
> >
> > So, there is no single exact pattern found in the whole tree, and a
> > few instances of similiar patterns of two kinds found only inside
> > omap. If I follow any of the two, either moving '__initdata' in
> > front of 'platform_device' or using '__initdata_or_module'
> > instead, the problem no longer hits me (using my custom
> > defconfig). However, the former seems not conformant to what one
> > can learn from include/linux/init.h, so I suspect that placing
> > __initdata like this can be a noop, while the latter means "can be
> > init if no module support", which would probably still exhibit the
> > problem if so configured.
> >
> > How would you like to have this corrected then?
>
> I guess removing __initdata from all platoform_device structures is
> the way to go. We need to find another way to silent the section
> mismatch warnings.
OK. I'll cook a patch which removes __initdata from all listed above
instead of only from board-ams-delta.
Thanks,
Janusz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
