Nishanth Menon wrote:
From: Aneesh V<aneesh@xxxxxx>
Make all hwmod data used for OMAP4430 available for
the OMAP44XX class so that OMAP4460 can use them.
We will modify the required 4460 hwmod in further patch(es).
[nm@xxxxxx: just rebased to .39]
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon<nm@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Aneesh V<aneesh@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 164 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 82 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
index abc548a..2f51a5a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod omap44xx_dmm_hwmod = {
.slaves_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(omap44xx_dmm_slaves),
.mpu_irqs = omap44xx_dmm_irqs,
.mpu_irqs_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(omap44xx_dmm_irqs),
- .omap_chip = OMAP_CHIP_INIT(CHIP_IS_OMAP4430),
+ .omap_chip = OMAP_CHIP_INIT(CHIP_IS_OMAP44XX),
I guess at the time that CHIP_IS_OMAP4430 was introduced it was totally
unthinkable that another 44xx based chip would ever exist?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
