The only user of omap_vc_i2c_init is vc.c itself, makes
no reason for us to expose it out.
This also fixes the sparse warning:
arch/arm/mach-omap2/vc.c:207:13: warning: symbol 'omap_vc_i2c_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/vc.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/vc.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/vc.c
index 42c77a8..d0b52cc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/vc.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/vc.c
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ static void __init omap4_vc_init_channel(struct voltagedomain *voltdm)
* channel registers. All other VC channels will use the
* same configuration.
*/
-void __init omap_vc_i2c_init(struct voltagedomain *voltdm)
+static void __init omap_vc_i2c_init(struct voltagedomain *voltdm)
{
struct omap_vc_channel *vc = voltdm->vc;
static bool initialized;
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
