Re: [PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH 0/6 V3] Cleanups for cpufreq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:10, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote:
> So here's a dumb question, being rather ignorant of CPUfreq on SMP.
>
> Should we be running a CPUfreq instance on both CPUs when they cannot be
> scaled independently?
>
> What is being scaled here is actually the cluster (the MPU SS via
> dpll_mpu_ck), not an individual CPU.  So to me, it only makes sense to
> have a an instance of the driver per scalable device, which in this case
> is a single MPU SS.
>
> What am I missing?

my understanding from the code is that we have one instance of cpufreq
controllable from either cpu0 or 1.

Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux