Re: [PM-WIP_CPUFREQ][PATCH V3 6/8] OMAP2+: cpufreq: fix freq_table leak

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 10:11, Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> When you're talking about potentially concurrent modification of data,
> that make sense.  Here you're implementing a plugin for an existing
> framework, and you can (and have to) make assumptions about when the
> callbacks are used.
ok, that is the one i was looking for. thanks. will use atomic ops and
drop the mutex.

Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux