> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Menon, Nishanth > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 7:27 AM > To: linux-omap > Cc: Nayak, Rajendra > Subject: [RFC][PATCH 7/9] OMAP4: powerdomain: Update MPU > powerdomain for 4460 > > From: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@xxxxxx> > > The 4460 platform has changes in the MPU powerdomain, > hence model a new powerdomain for it and identify > is using the CHIP_IS_OMAP446X macro. > Also move all the common powerdomains to use > CHIP_IS_44XX so they are reused on OMAP4460. > [snip]...[snip] > +static struct powerdomain mpu_446x_pwrdm = { > + .name = "mpu_pwrdm", > + .prcm_offs = OMAP4430_PRM_MPU_INST, > + .prcm_partition = OMAP4430_PRM_PARTITION, > + .omap_chip = OMAP_CHIP_INIT(CHIP_IS_OMAP4460), [sp] This change doesn't go with the description above. Shouldn't this be CHIP_IS_OMAP44XX or CHIP_IS_OMAP446X to be more future safe? ~sanjeev -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
