On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 15:08, Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 02:37:43AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: >> this should probably get squashed in.. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c | 6 ++++-- >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c >> index 6e3666a..45f1e9e 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap2plus-cpufreq.c >> @@ -84,8 +84,10 @@ static int omap_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, >> if (is_smp() && (num_online_cpus() < NR_CPUS)) >> return ret; >> >> - /* Ensure desired rate is within allowed range. Some govenors >> - * (ondemand) will just pass target_freq=0 to get the minimum. */ >> + /* >> + * Ensure desired rate is within allowed range. Some govenors >> + * (ondemand) will just pass target_freq=0 to get the minimum. > > So long as the comment is being touched up, could fixup the typo for > "governor" (and also copied to a new block of code in another patch > in the series). Will do. thanks for catching it :). Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
