On 05/11/11 09:32, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:28 +0530, Janorkar, Mayuresh wrote:
>
>>> +static void __init ldp_display_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + int r;
>>> +
>>> + struct gpio gpios[] = {
>>> + {LCD_PANEL_RESET_GPIO, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "LCD RESET"},
>>> + {LCD_PANEL_QVGA_GPIO, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, "LCD QVGA"},
>>> + {LCD_PANEL_ENABLE_GPIO, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "LCD ENABLE"},
>>> + {LCD_PANEL_BACKLIGHT_GPIO, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW, "LCD
>>> BACKLIGHT"},
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + r = gpio_request_array(gpios, ARRAY_SIZE(gpios));
>>> + if (r) {
>>> + pr_err("Cannot request LCD GPIOs, error %d\n", r);
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>> If I test with this patch, this request is returning error.
> Hmm. Well, the GPIOs are the same as in the old driver. However, the old
> driver doesn't even seem to check if it manages to request the GPIOs, so
> it may well be that it was failing also.
>
> Can you check from /sys/class/gpio/ if some of the GPIOs are already
> allocated: 207, 199, 55, 56?
>
> The definition of two of those GPIOs look kinda funny to me: (15 +
> OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES). I don't know what OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES means, but
> it sure doesn't sound ok to have a GPIO number that is 15 over the
> maximum =).
>
This means that some kind of gpio expander is used.
I bet those are twl gpios (or may be some other discrete chip).
If those are twl gpios then you need to provide the .setup callback
in struct twl4030_gpio_platform_data which will request and setup those gpios.
--
Regards,
Igor.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
