On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 11:42 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > What about using the standard pr_debug()/dev_dbg() instead? > With dynamic debug, it can be enabled at run time. > As a bonus, you get printf()-style format checking if debugging is disabled. Yes, dev_dbg & co. would be better. However, one thing I dislike about them is the extra stuff they print. For example, for omapfb and omapdss dev_dbg will print: omapfb omapfb: foo omapdss_dss omapdss_dss: foo I originally added the debug macros to omapdss to be able to automatically print the DSS module name, as at that point there was only one big omapdss device. And I guess I just followed with similar macro in omapfb also. But I believe both omapdss and omapfb should be changed to dev_* prints sometime soon. Tomi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
