On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 09:19:25PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 10:11:07PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 02:06:07PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > This is work in progress. > > > > > > We have two SoCs using SRAM, both with their own allocation systems, > > > and both with their own ways of copying functions into the SRAM. > > I havn't checked the details, but maybe the code in > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/iram_alloc.c could be migrated to your approach, too? > > Its already in there now that I have replies from Nguyen Dinh. It > looks like this presently: > > arch/arm/plat-mxc/Kconfig | 2 +- > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iram.h | 24 +++++++-- > arch/arm/plat-mxc/iram_alloc.c | 50 +++++--------------- > > and if we get rid of the iram_alloc/iram_free wrappers around the > sram_pool (now pv_pool) alloc/free in iram.h, in the same way I've > done for Davinci, then we get less new additions too. Great! Thanks, Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
