Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] ARM: move SH-mobile runtime PM to arm/common for sharing with other platforms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thursday, April 07, 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> Paul Mundt <lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 05:02:47PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> >> There is really nothing SH-mobile specific about this runtime PM
>> >> implementation.  Any platform wanting to implement runtime PM based on
>> >> simple clock gating can use this implementation.
>> >> 
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxx>
>> >
>> > This observation is wholly architecture agnostic, so it's not clear that
>> > keeping it in arch/arm/common is any better. It seems that this would be
>> > better suited for drivers/base/power/ with a generic Kconfig symbol.
>> 
>> Sounds fine to me.
>
> Well, what platforms is the clock framework available on?

Well, the majority of implementations of <linux/clk.h> are certainly in
ARM, but I know it's also implemented for SH, and a quick grep shows
implementations in powerpc, mips and m68k also.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux