Re: [PATCH 0/4] iommu: Prevent oops in iommu_get() and while arch_iommu is in use

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Sakari,

On Wednesday 30 March 2011 10:16:56 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday 25 March 2011 20:37:55 Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> 
> >>> This patchset is aimed to fix a problem in arch_iommu implementation
> >>> references. When an actual arch_iommu implementation is not loaded
> >>> while iommu_get() is being called results to a kernel oops, as well as
> >>> removing an arch_iommu implementation which is in use.
> >> 
> >> How about fixing the dependency instead? Right now iommu2 depends on
> >> iommu because of the calls to
> >> install_iommu_arch/uninstall_iommu_arch... we should change that
> >> dependency to iommu depend on iommu2. Something like iommu (plat)
> >> querying iommu2 (mach) for devices to install.
> > 
> > The reason why iommu depends on iommu2 and not the other way around is
> > because several mach-specific iommu implementations should be able to
> > coexist in the same kernel. The right one should be loaded at runtime.
> > 
> > I think that Sakari's patches correcty fix the problems he noticed.
> > However, they won't fix one basic issue, which is that the iommu2 module
> > won't be automatically pulled in when the omap3isp module is loaded. The
> > omap3isp driver will then fail to probe the device. That's better than
> > crashing though.
> 
> One option would be to specify the name of the module in the platform
> data and request_module() that in omap_iommu_probe(). This would solve
> the issue, not sure how pretty is this though.

Do we need that ? My understanding is that a machine will need a single mach-
specific iommu implementation only. Drivers shouldn't need to care about that. 
The iommu implementation should be automatically selected based on the machine 
time.

> In a generic case there would have to be a list of modules implementing
> iommu in the platform data.
> 
> > One possible solution for that is to turn the tristate option for iommu2
> > into a bool option. I've also read a couple of times that the kernel
> > provides a standard iommu API. Maybe switching to it would help.
> 
> That would solve it as well, but having it as a module would be nice, too.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux