On 3/9/2011 4:18 PM, Andy Green wrote:
On 03/09/2011 02:31 PM, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
Minor comment, Can you use
BIT(0) for 1, BIT(1) for 2 ... BIT (8) for 0x100
OK, I agree it will be nicer. Thanks for the comment.
I guess I can just change this and issue just this guy as try 3 rather
than sending the whole series mostly unchanged. In that case, I'll take
care of Benoit's member re-ordering to match the scripts at the same
time and issue that guy as try 3 as well.
It is up to Ben, but maybe it will be less confusing to re-send the
whole series, since you have at least two patches to update.
Maybe, just wait a little bit in case someone else has something to say
about this series.
Benoit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
