* Michael BÃsch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> [110303 06:16]: > On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 11:42 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2011 at 05:11:58PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > @@ -175,9 +124,9 @@ static int retu_wdt_release(struct inode > > > struct retu_wdt_dev *wdev = file->private_data; > > > > > > #ifndef CONFIG_WATCHDOG_NOWAYOUT > > > - retu_wdt_ping_enable(retu_wdt); > > > + retu_wdt_ping_enable(wdev); > > > #endif > > > - clear_bit(0, &retu_wdt->users); > > > + clear_bit(0, &wdev->users); > > > > this hunk isn't part of this patch. > > Well, it's a compiler warning cleanup, so I thought it would be fine > to go with the big cleanup patch. > Is it necessary to do a separate patch for this? Well looks like I already applied some earlier version of this.. Sorry. Anyways, can you please check what's still missing from the cbus branch? I've now applied the ones Felipe acked. At least this patch needs to be refreshed to apply on top of the cbus branch. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
