RE: [PATCH v5 REPOST 0/5] ARM: omap[34]: Thumb-2 compatibility fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Hilman [mailto:khilman@xxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:05 AM
> To: Santosh Shilimkar
> Cc: Dave Martin; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> patches@xxxxxxxxxx; Tony Lindgren; Jean Pihet-XID; linux-
> omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nicolas Pitre; linaro-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 REPOST 0/5] ARM: omap[34]: Thumb-2
> compatibility fixes
>
> Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> writes:
>
> > Dave,
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:05 PM
> >> To: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Cc: patches@xxxxxxxxxx; Tony Lindgren; Santosh Shilimkar; Jean
> >> Pihet; Kevin Hilman; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nicolas Pitre;
> >> linaro-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 REPOST 0/5] ARM: omap[34]: Thumb-2
> >> compatibility fixes
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Dave Martin
> <dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >> > This set of patches, along with some other patches under
> >> > discussion on alkml, should enable omap3 and omap4 kernels to
> be
> >> > built with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL.
> >> >
> >> > This patch set builds on recent cleanup done by the omap
> >> > maintainers.
> >> >
> >> > At least some of this code definitely works, most features have
> >> > been tested successfully.  Further testing, especially of
> Thumb-2
> >> > behaviour, is still welcome.
> >> >
> >> > In particular, I still have no Ack/Tested-by on the following
> >> > patches, so it would be great if anyone who has an opportunity
> >> > to do a final review / re-test can do so.
> >> >
> >> >  * ARM: omap3: Convert END() to ENDPROC() for correct linkage
> with
> >> CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL
> >> >  * ARM: omap3: Thumb-2 compatibility for sram34xx.S
> >> >  * ARM: omap3: Thumb-2 compatibility for sleep34xx.S
> >>
> >> Following up on this, it looks like I have some locally-recorded
> >> acks
> >> which didn't make it into my posting ...
> >>
> >> The one patch I currently have no feedback on is this one:
> >>
> >>   * ARM: omap4: Provide do_wfi() for Thumb-2
> >>
> > You can drop this one since do_wfi()  won't be needed
> > anymore after my recent series.
> >
> > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg46495.html
>
> Santosh,
>
> I'm planning to queue/merge Dave's series as-is for 2.6.39, since it
> has
> already received significan review & testing.
>
> When you update your OMAP4 series, feel free to drop it as needed.
>
Fine with me.

Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux