Hi Tony, >-----Original Message----- >From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@xxxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 11:13 PM >To: Sricharan R >Cc: linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Benoit Cousson; paul@xxxxxxxxx; Santosh >Shilimkar >Subject: Re: [PATCH] omap2+: mux: Initialise the static pads. > >* Sricharan R <r.sricharan@xxxxxx> [110304 09:31]: >> Hi Tony, >> >> >Hmm it's there as commit 93c5f165e10c21a3813a687204388a34072b2a62 >> >> >in devel-mux branch. Can you please update your patch against >> >> >that commit so it's easier to see what your changes are? >> >> > >> >> >BTW, the patch you posted got trashed by your email client >> >> >or server.. >> >> > >> >> Here is the updated patch on top of your previous patch. > >The patch formatting is still trashed, notice the double line >spacing.. > Very sorry about this. Below is the link for the patch. http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129947252016935&w=2 >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c >> >> @@ -359,7 +359,6 @@ void omap_hwmod_mux(struct omap_hwmod_mux_info *hmux, >u8 >> state) > >..and the line wrapping of the patch lines. > >> >> + if ((state == _HWMOD_STATE_ENABLED) && hmux->pads_dynamic >> >> + && hmux->enabled) { > >Yes I see that might allow removing the idle flag. Will give it >a try with my testcase once you get your mail issue sorted out >and can post a patch that applies. > Ok. I have checked this applies on top of the devel-mux branch. >Tony > Thanks, Sricharan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
