> -----Original Message----- > From: Cousson, Benoit [mailto:b-cousson@xxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 8:29 PM > To: Nayak, Rajendra > Cc: Paul Walmsley; Shilimkar, Santosh; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Integration branch base switchover to Tony's omap-for- > linus branch > > Hi Rajendra, > > On 3/4/2011 3:08 PM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote: > > Hi Paul, > > [...] > > > This however is still not rootcaused and is not the same as the > issue > > seen with i2c as the WE for GPT1 is already programmed for > enabling > > wakeup. > > > > The one way to fix this for now is to put GPT1 block in software > > controlled idle as was done by your test patch for i2c. > > > > --- > > From fde94c22bb2db233b0b0cc4c2024d6f4e9f95257 Mon Sep 17 > 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@xxxxxx> > > Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 19:33:45 +0530 > > Subject: [PATCH] OMAP4: hwmod: Disable hardware-controlled idle > for GPT1 > > Maybe we should emphasis the temporary need for this commit to avoid > forgetting it? > > > Some issues seen (which cause lockups in suspend) with GPT1 > > after the MPU<->L4_WKUP static dependency was cleared can be > > Worked-around for now by forcing GPT1 in software > > controlled idle. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@xxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 2 +- > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c > > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c > > index 2c58827..9317a05 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c > > @@ -3989,7 +3989,7 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_ocp_if > > *omap44xx_timer1_slaves[] = { > > static struct omap_hwmod omap44xx_timer1_hwmod = { > > .name = "timer1", > > .class =&omap44xx_timer_1ms_hwmod_class, > > - .flags = HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE | > HWMOD_INIT_NO_RESET, > > + .flags = HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE | HWMOD_INIT_NO_RESET > | > > HWMOD_SWSUP_SIDLE, > > I was wondering why the previous flags were still there, but it > looks > like the revert was not done. > > I'll push it with the revert for the flags. > > Where is the Santosh's branch that should be rebased on top of that > one? > I am trying to rebase it on Kevin's pm-core branch. Will cherry pick these patches -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
