Hi, On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Menon, Nishanth <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 15:39, Gulati, Shweta <shweta.gulati@xxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Menon, Nishanth <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 14:57, Shweta Gulati <shweta.gulati@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> This Patch adds OPP enteries for IVA in OMAP4 OPP Table >>>> and updates IVA voltage Rail values obtained from latest >>>> OMAP4430 Data Manual Operating Condition Addendum. >>> Do you think we should add the version of the document in the commit >>> message - it looks like every "latest" version we look at has some >>> update, so we'd know what baseline the code currently maps to when we >>> do a git blame at a later point of time >> Ok, Will do. > Sorry, one more tiny point I missed - for the sake of ensuring the > functional bisectability - could you do the following: > a) update voltages (MPU,IVA) for doc 0.3 > b) introduce IVA OPPs > what do you think? I think its better to submit MPU and IVA domain Patches seperately The way I have done: 1. Patch Series that has MPU OPP Table and Voltage Rail Value changes. 2. Patch which adds IVA OPP Entries and updates Voltage Rail values. > > Regards, > Nishanth Menon > -- Thanks, Regards, Shweta -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
