On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 06:22:36 +0530 Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> wrote: > Kevin Hilman wrote, on 03/03/2011 06:18 AM: > > Nishanth Menon<nm@xxxxxx> writes: > >> Looks like a nice cleanup to me. > >> > >> if the motivation of patch 1/3 is to do this cleanup, I am altogether > >> for it (lesser code == lesser bugs ;) ). btw, this should not impact > >> class1.5 either - core sr.c sequencing has not been modified in sr1.5 > >> :) > >> Heh, no any hidded motivation here. I was just blind to see your 12/18 and I found the issue and cleanup possibilities at the same time and decided to put them into same RFC set :-) > > Nishanth, > > > > I'd prefer if you handle these. You can add them to the fixup/cleanup > > part of your SR1.5 series. > > ok will pull this in as part of sr1.5 series if no further review comments. > Ok, that's fine to me (though your set has the priority as I didn't notice the 12/18). -- Jarkko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
