On Tue, Mar 01, 2011 at 11:26:56AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 01:22:28PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> [110228 06:21]: > > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:56:11AM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 02:19:31PM +0530, Hema HK wrote: > > > > > > > > > > There is some problem with idle path offmode in mainline, I could not test > > > > > with offmode. But I have tested this patch with resetting the controller > > > > > in the idle path when wakeup from retention just to make sure that the > > > > > context is lost, and restore path is working fine. > > > > > > > > Tony and Greg, how do we handle this one ? Who should take my pull request > > > > for this series ? I hope we still have a little time to get this into > > > > 2.6.39, but if we don't I can hold on to them until 2.6.40. > > > > > > Doesn't bother me which tree they go through, I can take them, or, if > > > it's easier due to omap merges, Tony can. > > > > I prefer Greg's queue unless there's some dependency issue to the > > patches we have in omap-for-linus. > > Turns out I can easily split what's supposed to go for you and what's > supposed to go for Greg, so I'll do it. Tony which commit can I use for > your tree ? Is mainline 2.6.38-rc6 ok ? Forget it, there's a dependency on a patch which is in Greg's queue, so I'll send them all through Greg. -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
