On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 10:36 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 06:17:01PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > > handle_nested_irq() expects a global IRQ number, so > > the irq_base has to be added to the RETU irq number. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@xxxxxxxxx> > > Good catch, while at that, could you also cook another patch to add > locking on retu_irq_handler ? We are using the internal lockless > version of the read/write functions, so we need to hold the mutex before > reading/writing to avoid problems. Ok, it probably is safe without locking (due to the reads being atomic), but I agree that it's more robust to add some locking here. I'll send a patch. -- Greetings Michael. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
