On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 23:28, Sanjeev Premi <premi@xxxxxx> wrote: > Add glue logic to hook-up AM35x processors > with TPS65023. > > Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Premi <premi@xxxxxx> [...] > +/** > + * TBD: Just a copy of OMAP3 PMIC info. > + * Many fields below don't make much sense for AM3517, > + * but keeping them as is for now. > + */ > +static struct omap_volt_pmic_info am3517_volt_info = { > + .slew_rate = 4000, > + .step_size = 25000, > + .on_volt = 1200000, > + .onlp_volt = 1000000, > + .ret_volt = 975000, > + .off_volt = 600000, > + .volt_setup_time = 0xfff, > + .vp_erroroffset = OMAP3_VP_CONFIG_ERROROFFSET, > + .vp_vstepmin = OMAP3_VP_VSTEPMIN_VSTEPMIN, > + .vp_vstepmax = OMAP3_VP_VSTEPMAX_VSTEPMAX, > + .vp_vddmin = OMAP3430_VP2_VLIMITTO_VDDMIN, > + .vp_vddmax = OMAP3430_VP2_VLIMITTO_VDDMAX, > + .vp_timeout_us = OMAP3_VP_VLIMITTO_TIMEOUT_US, > + .i2c_slave_addr = OMAP3_SRI2C_SLAVE_ADDR, > + .pmic_reg = OMAP3_VDD_CORE_SR_CONTROL_REG, > + .vsel_to_uv = tps65023_vsel_to_uv, > + .uv_to_vsel = tps65023_uv_to_vsel, > +}; I see your point in http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=129847126805656&w=2 "Check the definition of omap_volt_pmic_info and omap_volt_data. Just to "hack" support we can fill *don't care* values for the fields not supported and wrap processing under if (cpu_is_....()) checks; but this doesn't appear to be a good solution" PMIC specific data: > + .slew_rate = 4000, > + .step_size = 25000, SoC specific data + PMIC limits: > + .on_volt = 1200000, > + .onlp_volt = 1000000, > + .ret_volt = 975000, > + .off_volt = 600000, I dont like the following at all! > + .volt_setup_time = 0xfff, SOC specific > + .vp_erroroffset = OMAP3_VP_CONFIG_ERROROFFSET, > + .vp_vstepmin = OMAP3_VP_VSTEPMIN_VSTEPMIN, > + .vp_vstepmax = OMAP3_VP_VSTEPMAX_VSTEPMAX, > + .vp_vddmin = OMAP3430_VP2_VLIMITTO_VDDMIN, > + .vp_vddmax = OMAP3430_VP2_VLIMITTO_VDDMAX, > + .vp_timeout_us = OMAP3_VP_VLIMITTO_TIMEOUT_US, PMIC speciic > + .i2c_slave_addr = OMAP3_SRI2C_SLAVE_ADDR, > + .pmic_reg = OMAP3_VDD_CORE_SR_CONTROL_REG, > + .vsel_to_uv = tps65023_vsel_to_uv, > + .uv_to_vsel = tps65023_uv_to_vsel, Yeah they ought to be split properly IMHO. Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html