> Better might be to introduce and use CHIP_GE_OMAP3630ES1 in hwmod > structs in that case - that should ease things up. but the ES1 story > should be fixed I guess. > > > > What do people think of this? > > > + Anand from commit b0a1a6ce0597662c06f970643da60b8ebb5cdd1c which > introduced the code in id.c to hear his views as well. There's one instance where we needed to distinguish between ES1.0 and all later revs of the 36xx - this was in commit 58dcfb3a0f (omap: 3630: disable TLL SAR on 3630 ES1). I chose to pick the same approach that was done for 3430 ES3.0 and below. We keep two "struct powerdomain core_3xx*pwrdm" instances in mach-omap2/powerdomains34xx.h with TLL SAR disabled in one. I couldn't think up a better way to handle this at the time. - Anand -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
