Hi Tony, On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Ramirez Luna, Omar <omar.ramirez@xxxxxx> [110215 16:11]: >> >> > If you have to do several platform_get_irq_byname to get this one, I'd >> > prefer to get rid of that name for OMAP4. It will make mailbox irq >> > consistent with the other hwmods. >> >> I was thinking to standardize the names to be mbox0..mboxN across all >> the platforms, reason being that the mailbox also has capabilities to >> be used not only by dsp or iva, by using a polling method. >> >> So even if the mailbox in OMAP3 is called "dsp", it has 4 more queues >> apart from the 2 used for messaging between arm and dsp, that could be >> used even if tidspbridge wasn't there. > > So what's the status of this series? Can the rest of the patches > now be applied on top of the current omap-for-linus or do the names > still need fixing? I'm going to remove the names for the hwmods with a single irq. And change the interface clock to be the main_clk, so it can be disabled when runtime pm is disabled. I won't resend the patch for OMAP4 hwmod data, as this was send earlier by Benoit. Regards, Omar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
