On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:33:56AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: > Agreed -- actually, I suspected we might need to support this. But I > don't think solving this problem (= keeping the fixup implementation > in memory and enhancing the module loader) solved the > fixups-referencing-sections-discarded-from-vmlinux problem. These > seem to be two separate issues. I am filing to understand something? They are separate, but related issues. They both ultimately have the same cause - the placement of the spinlock code inline rather than out of line, resulting in fixups appearing all over the place rather than just in kernel/spinlock.o. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
