No one can confirm this?
On 02/03/2011 08:31 AM, Adam Wozniak wrote:
I'm hoping I'm just not understanding something and this isn't as
broke as I fear it is.
I'm using the ISP on an OMAP3530, linux 2.6.32. I've got some kernel
code I want to lock in both the process context and the ISP interrupt
context, so I'm using a spinlock. As I understand it, locking the
spinlock should disable all interrupts. However, I'm still seeing the
ISP interrupt happen when I've got the spinlock locked in the process
context.
i.e. somewhere I've got the code below, and my Warning is tripping.
Is this broken, or am I not understanding something?
int am_i_locked = 0;
spinlock_t my_spinlock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
void foo(void) {
/* function could be called from process context, or could be
called from omap34xx_isp_isr (interrupt context) */
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&my_spinlock, flags);
WARN_ON(am_i_locked);
am_i_locked++;
/* do some stuff */
am_i_locked--;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&my_spinlock, flags);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
