> -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 4:33 PM > To: Santosh Shilimkar > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Tony Lindgren; Jean Pihet- > XID; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nicolas Pitre > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: omap[34]: Thumb-2 compatibility > fixes > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Santosh Shilimkar > <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Dave, > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Dave Martin [mailto:dave.martin@xxxxxxxxxx] > >> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:33 PM > >> To: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Cc: Dave Martin; Tony Lindgren; Santosh Shilimkar; Jean Pihet; > >> linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Nicolas Pitre > >> Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: omap[34]: Thumb-2 compatibility > fixes > >> > >> This set of patches, along with some other patches under > >> discussion on alkml, should enable omap3 and omap4 kernels to be > >> built with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL. > >> > >> This patch set builds on recent cleanup done by the omap > >> maintainers. > >> > >> It is also more aggressive than my last post: all affected > >> low-level code is now built in Thumb-2. At least some of this > >> code definitely works, but whether the Secure firmware can talk > >> to Thumb-2 code properly is unproven: > >> in particular, I could use some help/advice from the omap > >> community for validating that the low-level power management > >> interactions actually work with this patch set. > >> > >> I've done simple "does it boot?" testing by building a single > >> kernel with CONFIG_SMP_ON_UP and CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL enabled > >> which works on Beagle xM A2 and Panda A1. > > > > I have boot tested this series on OMAP3430 and OMAP4430. Also > > tested the RETENTION and OFF mode in suspend on OMAP3. > > Which tree did you use to test this? It didn't seem to work for me > -- > sometimes the system wouldn't suspend, complaining about USB suspend > errors; and other times I couldn't bring it out of suspend (by > poking > a USB input device). > > I might be doing something wrong... > I should have mentioned this. Used Kevins pm branch to test these features. git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git > > I couldn't test the DVFS because it isn't in mainline yet > > but the changes doesn't looks to break anything. > > > > So if you like, you can add > > Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@xxxxxx> > > > > Thanks, that's great. > > If there some other tree with DVFS working which I could try? Even > if > these patches don't apply, I may be able to test whether the changes > should work. > DVFS support is getting added and one series was posted by Vishwa. The link for the same is : http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg44393.html Regards, Santosh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
