Salut Benoît, On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > Salut Paul, > > On 12/7/2010 2:25 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > Split the existing cm44xx.h file into cm1_44xx.h and cm2_44xx.h files > > so they match their underlying OMAP hardware modules. Add clockdomain > > offset information. > > > > Add header files for the MPU local PRCM, prcm_mpu44xx.h, and for the > > SCRM, scrm44xx.h. SCRM register offsets still need to be added; TI > > should do this. > > And we did it :-) Even better :-) > I sent it last week along with clock data series: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/373751/ > > OK, I've just realized that it was a little bit hidden in the clock data > patch, and maybe we should have been sent two patches. > Sorry for that. Do you want to take it in that series, or should I re-sent the > clock data one? I guess it's better done in the clock series; that should avoid a branch dependency between the PRCM patchsets and the clock patch sets. One thing that would be nice on the scrm44xx.h file is to keep the _OFFSET macros. It would be nice in the long run to get rid of the absolute addressing macros in case someone decides to shuffle around the IP block addresses again... can you update your clock series with that change? Getting the clock patchsets put together for 2.6.38 is one of the next big projects here. - Paul
