Re: [PATCH] OMAP PM: Optimize cpufreq transition latency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Currently cpufreq transition latency value does not really reflect the actual
> OMAP OPP transition delay. This patch has the actual latency value.
> I did profile the DVFS latency on OMAP3430, OMAP3630 and OMAP4 for worstcase(MPU and Core together) and found that in none of these platforms, transiton value
> goes beyong 10ms. Added a buffer of 20ms to avoid too frequent ondemand timer
> expiry.
> With this change, performance of ondemand governor is improved when tested
> using cpufreqbench tool. Without this patch, cpufreq-bench reported ondemand
> performance as 40% of performance governor, and with this patch it's around 70%
> (using below procedure).
>
> cpufreq-bench:
> http://lwn.net/Articles/339862/
> http://ftp.riken.go.jp/archives/Linux/suse/people/ckornacker/cpufreq-bench/
>
> Command used for performance testing:
> cpufreq-bench -l 50000 -s 100000 -x 50000 -y 100000 -g ondemand -r 5 -n 5 -v
>
> Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>  mode change 100644 => 100755 arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c
> old mode 100644
> new mode 100755
> index c47faf8..d3fc423
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/cpu-omap.c
> @@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ static int __init omap_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>        policy->max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
>        policy->cur = omap_getspeed(0);
>
> -       /* FIXME: what's the actual transition time? */
> -       policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 300 * 1000;
> +       /* Program the actual transition time for worstcase */
> +       policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 30 * 1000;

Vishwa,

This is a frequent periodic timer.  Does a smaller value have any
affect on CPUidle wakeups?

Thanks,
Mike

>        return 0;
>  }
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux