Felipe Balbi <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Hari, On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 22:01 -0600, Kanigeri, Hari wrote: > Of course :), profiling was done before releasing this code and no > difference observed with or without blocking notifier. All the OMAP4 would you share some numbers ? > use cases are exercising this code. Just curious , are you doubting > the blocking notifier mechanism ? a little bit. Yeah. It added about 600ms of time spent on musb's probe when we were using blocking notifier for charger detection. When we moved to atomic notifier, that was solved. Anyway, you can never be sure when that will be scheduled and if cpu is really busy, it might pose a great deal. -- balbi _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
