RE: [PATCH 0/5] OMAP4: mux: Initialise OMAP4 mux pins.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




>-----Original Message-----
>From: Tony Lindgren [mailto:tony@xxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 2:56 AM
>To: Cousson, Benoit
>Cc: R, Sricharan; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] OMAP4: mux: Initialise OMAP4 mux pins.
>
>* Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@xxxxxx> [101118 12:56]:
>> On 11/18/2010 8:06 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> >* sricharan<r.sricharan@xxxxxx>  [101114 23:26]:
>> >>This series updates the core device drivers to use mux framework
>> >>for OMAP4 SDP and PANDA board. It's generated against the
>> >>linux-omap master branch. It has a dependency on the Benoit's
>> >>omap4 mux data series.
>> >
>> ><snip>
>> >
>> >>2. Do PAD configuration independently for each module
>> >>Pros:
>> >>	a. Avoids repetition of similar data for different boards.
>> >>	b. Gives a knowledge of how pins are configured for a module
>> >>	   to the respective owners.
>> >>	c. Pads are not initialised unless they are really needed.
>> >>Cons:
>> >>	a. Can become difficult to maintain if lot of data tend to be
>> >>	   different across boards.
>> >
>> >For the common modules, we should have generic platform init code
>> >using hwmod. And that init code is the logical place to do the muxing.
>> >
>> >We also need to consider that the pin muxing is board specific.
>> >So in cases where the are alternative signal paths, we need to pass
>> >the signal names from board-*.c file to the platform driver init code.
>>
>> What about the omap_board_mux array in board file? Do you want to
>> get rid of it, or is the plan is to use that for pads that does not
>> belong to any driver or pads that are purely board specific?
>
>Well we might as well keep it around for now as that's the way
>some people prefer to do the muxing. But yeah, eventually that
>could be for only board specific unused pads.
>
>I'll post some sample patches related to the uart (re)muxing
>within next few days, then let's see how that will work for
>other devices.
>
>Here's the rough plan in case you have some ideas on it:
>
>1. board-*.c code calls omap_serial_init_port with struct omap_device_mux
>   array that contains the pin names
>
>2. serial.c init code muxes the pins the right way and sets
>   wake-up events for omap3 & 4. It also populates the runtime
>   remux values needed for omap2 uart
>
>3. serial.c init code saves the struct omap_device_mux pointer
>   to the related hwmod entry
>
>4. omap_device_idle/shutdown can then call omap_remux if the
>   omap_device_mux entry exists
>   ...
>
>This should solve how devices need to initialize the pads.
>It should also work for all devices that may require runtime
>remuxing, like some USB transceivers and eMMC.


Ok . This means that the pin muxing introduced
 would be applicable for omap 2 ,3 and 4 also, with the
board file passing the respective data if they are different ?


>Regards,
>
>Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux