* Cousson, Benoit <b-cousson@xxxxxx> [101116 08:53]: > Hi Tony, > > On 11/16/2010 5:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >* Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@xxxxxx> [101115 13:36]: > >>Hi Tony, > >> > >>On 11/15/2010 9:03 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>>* Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@xxxxxx> [101111 13:26]: > >>>>Starting on OMAP4, the pin mux configuration is located in two > >>>>different partitions of the control module (CODE_PAD and WKUP_PAD). > >>>>The first one is inside the core power domain whereas the second > >>>>one is inside the wakeup. > >>>>- Add the capability to add any number of partition during board init > >>>>time depending of Soc partitioning. > >>>>- Add some init flags as well in order to avoid explicit Soc version > >>>>check inside the mux core code. > >>>>- Add a comment with mux0 mode on top of omap_mux/board/<partition> > >>>>if the current mux mode is not the default one. > >>> > >>>Here's one more patch that I'd like to merge into this patch to avoid > >>>repeating the partition for each mux entry. > >> > >>The memory vendors will not like you ;-) > >> > >>>Assuming no more comments, I'll queue these for 2.6.38 merge window. > >> > >>I'll update the series and re-post tomorrow. > > > >Thanks, no need to post them again, I already have them queued > >locally, they will hit for-next and linux-omap master today. > > OK, but I already did it because there is a checkpatch issue in your > first patch and I received another patch from Dan to add __func__ in > the pr_xxx macros. > I can repost, or you can get the update in my GIT (ctrl-wip/mux-omap4-v4). OK, if they're changed maybe repost the whole series one more time, and then I'll merge in your branch assuming no more comments. > >BTW, next time you do a git branch, please base it on Linus recent > >-rc tag instead of linux-omap master branch. We don't want the > >history of linux-omap master branch merged to the mainline tree.. > > Euh, this is what I already did for this series. Quoting myself: > > "The series is based on mainline (2.6.37-rc1) and is available here: > git://gitorious.org/omap-pm/linux.git ctrl-wip/mux-omap4-v3" > > Did I messed up something? No, mux-omap4-v4 branch looks OK. I guess what I tried pulling was something older. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
