On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 02:04:14PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-11-10 at 12:51 +0100, ext Paul Mundt wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:45:18AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > Improve the error prints to give more information about the offending > > > address & size. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > 1-3 queued for .37, thanks. > > They were just for review =). > > If it's ok to you, I'll pick all OMAP display related patches to my > tree, and send you a pull request when I think they are ready. > I wasn't sure what your intentions were, but that's of course fine, too! Please keep an eye on the -rc timing however, so we don't end up with bigger things piling up in the later -rc stages and then have to start cherry-picking the urgent bits. > But for these three patches it's ok if you already queued them: they are > quite high priority, as the OMAP framebuffer doesn't work at all without > the second patch. > Right. I looked through the OMAP list archives for some context on these first and since the second one was at least a build fix I assumed you wanted to get them merged sooner rather than later. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
