* Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [101019 15:48]: > * Gadiyar, Anand <gadiyar@xxxxxx> [101019 11:26]: > > On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > * Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@xxxxxx> [101019 07:41]: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> linux-next, as of 20101019, built with the omap2plus_defconfig fails > > >> to boot on omap3 and omap4. (I've disabled CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2 or > > >> CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE to get the image to build). Building with only > > >> ARCH_OMAP3 allows the resultant image to boot up on OMAP3. Likewise, > > >> an image built with only ARCH_OMAP4 boots up on OMAP4 boards. > > >> > > >> earlyprintk does not provide any additional prints after > > >> "Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel." > > >> > > >> Any ideas where to look? > > > > > > Hmm I did a quick test merge of linux-omap master and rmk/devel > > > branches and that boots just fine. > > > > > > So it's probably something that already got fixed in rmk/devel > > > but is not yet in next, or something that came from elsewhere, > > > or something that we have in omap-testing branch that's not in > > > for-next for some reason. > > > > I tried bisecting linux-next between v2.6.36-rc8 and HEAD, but > > there's a commit in between that breaks the build. I'll take another > > stab at this in a while. > > Looks like current next at 80f8f1f8b33750d954beb386c0c8142d0c01c25c > boots again except on 2430sdp it produces a NULL pointer at ubi_io_write. Oops, sorry it's still broken, wrong tree. Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
